CURRICULUM COMPACTING "is the process of identifying learning
objectives, pretesting students for prior mastery of these objectives,
and eliminating needless teaching or practice if mastery can be documented"
(Reis et al. 1992, p.10).
Curriculum compacting is increasingly being used in classrooms as
part of teaching that is more precisely focused on student needs. The
aim is to avoid wasting time and risking loss of motivation in teaching
material that students have already mastered. The technique simultaneously
generates the time needed for extension activities, independent projects,
mentoring and similar educational strategies that are more appropriate
for the students.
Research from the US suggests [1] that the difficulty level of textbooks
has declined (Farr & Tulley 1985) with "new work" in mathematics
texts only accounting for about half of the texts' content (Flanders
1987), [2] that most average late primary students can pass pretests
on basal comprehension tests before the material is presented (Taylor
& Frye 1988), [3] that eliminating up to 50% of the grade level
curriculum for gifted students made no difference in achievement test
results (Reis et al. 1992), and [4] that with minimal training teachers
can effectively identify and eliminate already mastered material (Reis
et al. 1992).
Curriculum compacting involves the following steps (Gibson 1993, Reis
et al. 1992, Winebrenner 1992):
- identifying the relevant learning objectives
- finding or developing some means of assessing students' achievement
of these objectives prior to instruction - important for teaching
focus and accountability, pretests can often be found in textbooks
- determining if all or only selected students should be pretested
for possible curriculum compacting - any selection could be based
on a wide range of factors covering general indications of both giftedness
and subject-specific talent, it could also be voluntary with the purpose
made clear to students
- pretesting - the assessment should be detailed enough to indicate
particular sub-areas of mastery and non-mastery, the concept of mastery
relates to the defined learning objectives, and may be at a similar
level to what would be considered "mastery" after instruction
- eliminating practice and instruction in areas where students have
achieved the learning objectives - generating time for these students
to participate in or pursue enrichment or acceleration options
- streamlining instruction of those sub-areas where students have
indicated achievement of some of the learning objectives
- offering acceleration and enrichment options - this challenging
step involves teacher preparation and planning and can include: students
working their way through the curriculum with teacher oversight, individual
or small group research or hands-on projects, mentoring, etc.
- keeping records - for both professional accountability and teacher
ease of management, records can include both specially designed forms
and student products and self-evaluation reports.
References
© David Farmer 31 January 1996 - This piece was adapted from
text I wrote for an educational video/booklet package Meeting
the Needs of Gifted Students in the Regular Classroom